196394189 --
Bullshit, Jesus was from the same gene pool his peers were from. He even attended their sermons in his youth, and enacted Jewish traditions as if they truly were of his own.
Europeans are tooNope, Europeans are recent converts to the Semitic faith
You don’t know what you’re talking about.
Read any British history from the 18th century or previous (strongly recommend Sharon Turner). Saxons are descendants of Scythians (who were called Sacae or Sakas by the Persians), and Britons are descended from Cimmerians, a related tribe. The Welsh even still call themselves Cymry. These were nomadic tribes from North-East of the Assyrian empire, beyond the Euphrates, where the bible and ancient historian Josephus admit is where the tribes of Israel were taken away to by the Assyrians.
The Scythians (a confederation of related tribes, in the same manner as the Israelites were a confederation) make their first appearance in south Russia/the Eurasian steppe no earlier than 700 BCE, just 14 years after Tiglath-Pileser sent them scattering IN THAT DIRECTION. The Persians, who under Cyrus the Great would destroy the Assyrians called all Scythian tribes Sacae/Saxa/Saka from whence both the names Saxon, and (according to the Declaration of Arbroath) Scot comes. The Irish annals make the same claim, that is, a line of Scythian descent.
Scythians in the early period where recorded by greek historians as having dietary restrictions against swine meat. Further, the extent of Scythia included the Caucus region in which in ancient times a kingdom called Iberia was situated-same name as the Iberian peninsula which was called so by the Phoenicians another confederacy which in the time before the scattering of the tribes included the Israelites, and was Levantine in origin - BER/IVRI are the Hebrew words for Hebrew in the ancient Hebrew language.
196397080 --
Crimea was, according to the secular Greek sources a centre for the Scythians, although the Greeks called the region Taurus, and claimed the Scythians had a habit of renaming the places they settled after the names of their various tribes. Crimea is derivative of Cimmeria, who according to Herodotus were a tribe within Scythia (remember the Cymry). They also renamed the rivers in the region; the Istros became the Danube, the Borysthenes became the Dnieper, the Tyras became the Dniester, and the Tanais became the Don.
Why is this relevant? Because the sea-faring Israelite tribe of Dan (DN in Hebrew) where famous for affixing there name upon the new lands they came to (the Tuatha de Dannan in Ireland were an advanced maritime people, associated with demi-gods. also the use of this name DN and it derivatives are spread to every Phoenician naval colony in some form or another.
The Phoenicians in trading settlements in Cornwall and or Devon, guess what that part of Britain was called for centuries? Dumnonia, or Dunmonia depending on the source. The Phoenicians had trade posts in modern Denmark, from whence they got amber. They settled the island of Sar_DANIA_. and the Spartans who both the bible and secular records records as being, in their own words, a “related people” to the Judeans, and descent from Abraham, also claimed to be descendant of a people called the Danaoi (more commonly known to us today as the Achaeans) and from their cousin tribe who were called Dorian (note the first and last letter). Furthermore these people were at times called the Heracleidae which means descent from Heracles, a figure often associated in comparative mythology with the biblical Samson, who was a Danite.
196400111 --
All that just scratches the surface as far as the lost tribes go, but lets turn our attention to the so called “jews” of today, known before their deception by their true name(s); primarily the Edomites, and through interbreeding, the Moabites and (most ominously) the Canaanites.
The Edomites lived to the south east of Judea, but was incorporated first by King David into his realm. When the Kingdom of Israel spilt into Judah to the South and the Northern kingdom of Israel, Edom remained a part of Judah. Now when the neo-Babylonian empire sacked Jerusalem and carried away the Judeans in captivity (a century after the assyrians had done virtually the exact same to the northern kingdom of Israel) the Edomites, who resented Judean dominance, joined Nebuchadnezzar’s attack, murdering countless, and assisting the Babylonians enslave those who remained.
Remember it was the previous Assyrians under Sargon the 2nd who scattered the northern Israelites, and nearly a century later their super-power successors the neo-Babylonians who do the same to the Judeans. In their wake, the Edomites remained and flourished, until the return of the Judeans from the Babylonian captivity when Cyrus the Great (Persian) conquered Babylon and allowed their return. To the dismay of the Edomites they resumed their previous positions, and ruled a Persian province of Yehud/Yehuda (Judah/Judaea) for another 200 years, until the coming of Alexander the great.
Alexander smashed the Persians and cobbled together the greatest empire the world had yet seen, but upon his death it was broken into 4, with the Seleucid dynasty taking Judaea along with essentially all of Babylonia. However, the Seleucids were based in modern day Syria, and the Ptolemies ruled out of Alexandria in Egypt, so the Kingdom of Judah was caught between these two Hellenistic realms, and as the dynasty fought many wars the kingdom (of Edomites and returned Judeans) changed hands many times.
196402988 --
Next to rule Judaea were the Hasmoneans.
You will recognize the Maccabees, this is the same family. Although the descent of Matthias Maccabees (father of Judas Maccabee) is somewhat murky it is most likely they were called Hasmonean because the family had originally come to Judaea from the formerly Moabite town of Hashbon.
The Maccabees were responsible for the mass murder of Greeks in Judaea, and whom they called “Hellenized Jews” in Jerusalem. The majority of the true Judeans who returned from captivity were living in and around Jerusalem, while the few who settled further out (like the Maccabees) interbred with the Edomite/Moabite/Canaanites who’d been push into the hinterlands with the return of the real Jews.
This brutal genocide against both Greeks (descents of the lost Israelites) and Hellenized Judeans (unmixed descents of the actual Jews) is still celebrated by the Phariseesatical “Jews” of today by the tradition of Hanukkah. The Maccabees, unconcerned with the mixing of blood that the ancient Hebrews abhorred forced all Edomites not already larping as Jews to “convert” to Judaism. this mixed up new kingdom was governed by Hasmoneans/Maccabees for centuries as hereditary “High Priests” of the Second temple. These priests became known as Sadducees and Pharisees.
The Pharisees became the more numerous and dominant of the two. Pharisee literally means separate, or separated, and it was these Pharisees who advocated for the sidelining of the Torah and introduction of what they called the “Oral Law”, which their descendants would later compile in the Talmud. The Sadducees were, if not pure-blooded Judeans, the nearest thing left at this point, and as such they have been smeared by the Pharisees as being Aristocratic, undemocratic, and an enemy of the “common people” or “common Jews” as the Pharisees called the country Edomites who’d settled Judah after the captivity.
196405315 --
Pharisees main dispute with the Sadducees was the matter of the “oral law” as the Pharisees called it, which the Sadducees called heretical nonsense (like Christ would later) and advocated the Torah/old testament. This so enraged the Pharisees that they took up the slogan that a we ya mamzer (a child born of illegal union-adultery, incest, race-mixing) was superior to the highest born Sadducee as long as they were learned in the oral law.
The Pharisees cemented their power by appealing to “common jews” (edomites) and disparaging the Sadducees as “greek-like” priests to “privileged” aristocratic class (this was simply a slander of the those Judeans of mostly true Judahite ancestry). The riled up the mobs of these new Jews, or “common people” against the few remaining descendants of the founding stock (sound familiar?) in time the Pharisees came to dominate the Sanhedrin (that same council that had Christ savagely tortured and killed) and it is these so called “Jews” with their anti-Torah, anti-Old Testament oral law, their primarily Edomite blood, their racial hatred of true Judeans, who appealed to Caesar’s enemy Pompey in et 60s BCE to destroy the Sadducees, and allow them to take full control of the province, which would become a vassal of Rome.
After a brief six year transition period the control of the Judaea was handed off to the pro-consul of the Roman Province of Syria.
The Syrian administration, subordinate to Rome further farmed out their responsibilities in Judah to an unabashed Edomite (seriously, he didn’t even pretend to be truly Jewish,) named Antipater. Now the name Antipater may not be as well known today as the name of dynasty he founded; they were called the Herodian Dynasty, as in Herod “the Great” (Antipater’s son!), as in the King who attempted to murder the Christ as a child to prevent the fulfillment of prophecy. This king (who modern Jews today called “Herod the Great”) is remembered in the Gospel for his brutal Massacre of the Innocents.
196407774 --
Herod “the Great” son of Antipater the Idumean (which is literally latin for Edomite) committed one of the most heinous acts in the Bible. I’ll start by refreshing your memory on the nativity story.
Remember the 3 Magi? Wise and Godly men who traveled from the north-east (remember where the Scythians/true Israelites went!). They followed the angels’ star to the place where the King of the (true) Jews was to be born. Along their way the stop at Jerusalem and there have an audience with King Herod. When Herod learns that these men seek a new future king they claim to of recently been born he is afraid that he will be ousted from power, and so sends the Magi on their way bidding them to return to him upon finding the Christ-child, so that he too may go and pay his respects to young Messiah.
This is, of course, a trap.
Herod intends to murder the child and halt prophecy to prolong his family seat on the throne, although Herod’s notions of family loyalty are selfish, projections of himself, and not love. Josephus records that he murders 3 of his own sons, and later Roman writers claim that Augustus himself (Octavian for you fans of HBO’s Rome) said it would be better to born a pig in Herod’s sty than to be born his own son. The angel Gabriel you’ll remember appears to both Joseph and the Magi, forewarning them of Herod’s treacherous intent, and bids the wise men take another route away from Jerusalem home and send Joseph with Mary and the Baby Jesus to Egypt to hide out until Herod’s death.
When Herod realizes that he’s been fooled he flies into a frothing rage, and orders every child in the vicinity under the age of two be put to death. When Herod dies, his Kingdom is split between his 3 sons and his daughter (Salome, Great-Grandmother AND Great Aunt of the Salome who murders John the Baptist - the Herodians start really ramping up the incest towards the end.) The three sons are Herod Archelaus, Herod Antipas, and Herod Phillip their half brother.
196410256 --
Herod the Great had other sons who he murdered, and from one these sons a grand-daughter was born named Herodias. She would marry her uncle with whom she conceived the child Salome (named for the previous Salome-it starts to get really, really confusing around here, this one will be tagged as #2.)
Salome #1, the daughter of Herod the Great (the baby-killer) married the governor of Gaza and Edom and with him conceived a child called Berenice (who was the mother of the aforementioned Herodias) Salome #1 broke with tradition when she took advantage of Roman law to divorce her husband, something her descendant and namesake would also shamelessly do. The grand-daughter Herodias, too, would continue this fine new tradition of divorce when he she get rid of Salome #2’s father and shacked up with his brother Herod Antipas.
Here enters John the Baptist, a proto-/pol/ack if ever there was one. John was the nephew of the Virgin Mary and a man who put speaking the truth above his own earthly well being. He openly denounced this incestuous family, and in doing so incurred the wrath of Herodias, mother of Salome #2. Herod Antipas (the man who stole his brother’s wife) was in fact a somewhat weak willed and easily frightened man. He feared John the Baptist immensely, and so he was reluctant to heed his sister-in-law/niece/wife’s demand that John be brutally slaughtered for speaking ill of her. Herod Antipas was also however (surprise, surprise) an infamous lecher, and he greatly desired the young (teenage) daughter of his new wife, Salome #2.
Remember that Salome #2 was not only his wife’s daughter, but his brother’s as well, and his sister’s great-granddaughter.
196411192 --
So Herodias, seething with hatred at John for publicly shaming her, waited until Herod Antipas’s birthday, upon which she threw a great feast and got her husband very drunk. She then brought in her own daughter and had her “dance” for her step-father. He so excited her uncle/NEW-DAD on with this antiquarian strip-tease, that, after working him into a frantic, desperate state of passion extracted from him a promise. He would grant one wish, and one wish only, that she asked then and there without hesitation. This Bible-age Harvey Weinstein, slobbering after his Step-daughter agreed and she, climbing onto his lap, leaned in, pressing her lips against his ear she breathed “I want the severed head of John the Baptist.”
This is the legacy of the so called Jews. and it is these people, this collection of Pharisees, false and foul princes, child-killers and adulterous, daughter whoring ancient roasties who are the blood ancestors of the people who, in the words of Christ himself “do call themselves Jews, but are not, and do lie”, and who are “Sons of their father the Devil”.
post end
Original posts by Canadian Anon 4id#pRqdeUEh. Posts organized, checked for spelling and grammar,
edited,
and emphasis/scripture added for your viewing pleasure by The Right Honorable King of Schizos.
What can we conclude from this riveting story? That the “Jews” of modernity are inbred Edomites wearing the title like a skin-suit, and that the ancient Judeans of the Bible are likely the progenitors of the Saxons, and the lost tribes of Israel the Europeans themselves.
Now that you’ve enjoyed this, consider the related material: Jesus Was Not A Jew
Sauce:
Some more quotes from Jewish material about their true lineage:
“Jews began to call themselves ‘Hebrews and Israelites’ in 1860”
– Judaica Encyclopedia 1971
“Esau-Edom is modern Jewry."
– 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia Vol.5 page 41
“Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a “Jew” or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or Hebrew."
– Jewish Almanac 1980, p.3.